We have not seen a financial storm like
the present one for decades. For many, the sudden intensity of this
financial cold snap, and the likely wintry recession ahead, has been a
surprise. In days of yore, winter and snow forced a community to come
together so that it would pull through and see off the cold, the wolves
and other dangers.
The hedge fund industry is a community. It is rightfully proud of the
many benefits that it has brought. It is not just making its clients
wealthier. It has helped transform the investment industry to the good.
It gives employment to many people and gives back through philanthropy
and charitable works. It has given liquidity to some markets and kept
them running. It is true that it is described as a Darwinian industry,
and that it is about "survival of the fittest" as if hedge fund managers
were a group of frontiersmen. However, in winter, even frontiersmen
helped each other through the hard times and stood up for their
community.Deep winter has come
to the industry. Performance is down sharply for many strategies.
Clients are redeeming. A few politicians are calling for the abolition
of hedge funds. Regulators are scrutinising the sector. Leverage is
harder to access. Parts of the mainstream media demonize the sector,
crowing in triumph at the difficulties it faces. The natural response is
to hunker down and let the storm pass. However, if individual funds do
that, when the blizzard is over and they emerge blinking into the
sunlight, they will likely see a very changed financial landscape. You
only need to see the recent statements out of Brussels to see where
things may be heading. As EU Economics and Monetary Affairs
Commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, recently told the EU Parliament "On hedge
funds, we have used as our basis that they must be regulated."
The industry has a choice. It can stand
up and be counted, and be part of the debate on how the financial
landscape should change, or leave it to the politicians and regulators
to sort things out. Clearly industry bodies work behind the scenes on
hedge funds' behalf, but there is plenty to do in the public eye to
change perceptions. This is where I must declare self interest. After
twelve years of selling and structuring hedge funds, I have moved into
media relations. I am doing it partly because it is a challenge, but
mainly because I am passionate about the hedge fund industry, and am
frustrated that it does not stand up for itself. It is a media punch
bag.
There is plenty that a good media
strategy can do to contribute to asset raising, client retention and
attracting talented employees. However, the media strategy needed now is
one engaging directly with the press and the broadcast media, and
through them with the public and politicians. If the case is not made,
and parts of the media paint hedge funds as causing market upheaval,
public opinion may turn even more negative. Public opinion moulds
political thought. Politicians drive policy responses and financial
regulation worldwide.
There are other consequences if hedge
funds do not engage. Institutional investors may shy away from
investment. Pension fund trustees reading " hedge funds are high risk "
stories may not invest. Local politicians may lean on local authority
pension plans and force sale of hedge fund positions or forbid any
exposure to hedge funds. Unions may question why their members' assets
are invested in such "risky" investments. Some institutions may stop
lending stocks. All this is not just possible in the context of one
country, but applies across regions such as Europe, the Middle East and
Asia.
The picture is not as bleak as it seems. There is plenty to be positive
about if the industry starts to engage with the media. Both the hedge
fund industry and the PR industry need to rethink things. For example:-
· Individual hedge funds need
to work much harder on communications with the media. They also need to
work more closely with industry bodies such as AIMA. AIMA works hard
behind the scenes lobbying on the industry's behalf. It also works hard
on the industry's behalf as shown by Chairman, Christopher Fawcett's
recent defence of the industry in print media, and on BBC's Newsnight.
· PR firms representing hedge
fund clients need to be more strategic in how they serve their
clients. Being non-reactive, even if that is the main brief, is
exacerbating media hostility. If PR agencies are to represent hedge fund
clients better, they need to be much more proactive and to push back at
a client's knee-jerk " no comment " reaction.
· The PR industry should also
take the hedge fund opportunity more seriously and learn more about the
industry and how it works. This means having accounts staffed by people
who really understand how their clients' investment strategies work, and
who are able to communicate this. This requires investment at a time
when hedge fund assets are likely to halve from their $1.9 trillion
peak. However, as 1998 and the early 1970s showed, the hedge fund
industry has gone through periodic retrenchment. These were exciting
times as they were when fresh stars of the hedge fund firmament were
born. After each retrenchment the industry has come back stronger.
Many hedge funds are launched because
their owners want to control their own destiny. Surrendering the media
landscape, with the likely consequences, runs against that philosophy.
There are grave dangers in ignoring the media. Equally, there are huge
benefits to be gained from engaging with the media in an open and
coordinated manner. If the hedge fund industry truly is a community, in
this financial winter, it needs to come out of the cold and stand
together in front of the media.